

to be continued ....
Moderador: Rein
How to distinguish 1E4 and 2D????Rein » 14 Sep 2009 11 escribió:you wrote earlier that the 1st printing of the S.O. was on 1E3 - if you have look at my scans you will see a much neater watermark for the S.O. - and the later printing was 1E4. Now you mention 2D!rubiera escribió: Yes, just like the 1 peso with map limits, the 5c offset is 1E1 only. BUT the 5c offset Servicio Oficial is 2D.
Si, como es el caso del 1 peso con limites, el 5c offset solo existe sobre el papel 1E1. PERO el 5c offset Servicio Oficial es RR difusos, o 2D.
Tony,
I would say both papers are there: the vertical direction of paper with 2D, the horizontal direction of paper with the 1E4!
That still bring us to the difference between 1E4 and 2D! or to the different perception of philatelists with the Rayos rectos!
I would not be surprised that the appearance of 2C - extremely well visible watermark [!] with long straight askew rays gave way to the "Rectos" (the line of AЯ mainly being horizontal] whereas with the line of AЯ being vertical the ondulation of the connecting rays was the striking thing.
All 3 blocks support the existence of a root block of 5x2!rubiera » 16 Aug 2009 14:28 escribió: .......
Estos tres bloques contienen variedades de plancha repetidas las cuales se encuentran en hileras y lo mas probable en bloques de diez, como es el caso de otras planchas.
![]()
rubiera » 16 Aug 2009 14:30 escribió: Estos dos bloques tienen varias variedades repetidas, ningunas en el patron de cinco columnas y dos hileras que se ha encontrado en otros casos.