Foro de Filatelia Argentina

Hello, I continue with my stamps classification, it is going to take me a life.. (I am not in a hurry).

I have some of stamps I will star with the picture below

It looks like ZA2 isn't?

what if there were MI2 how I can differentiate them?

thanks

Sergio

stamps9407 escribió:Hello, I continue with my stamps classification, it is going to take me a life.. (I am not in a hurry).

I have some of stamps I will star with the picture below

It looks like ZA2 isn't?

what if there were MI2 how I can differentiate them?

thanks

Sergio

Sergio,


the wire is asymmetrical so it is ZA 1!




The horizontal distance between the hearts of the sun should be 17.5 [ZA] or 16mm [MI 2]

saludos, Rein

PS

MI 2 does NOT occur for the 10c!

Rein escribió:The horizontal distance between the hearts of the sun should be 17.5 [ZA] or 16mm [MI 2]

is this distance (17.5) valid for all Zárate papers?

Thanks
Sergio

I have another one, looks like Zarate paper (m position).

It looks like the other one (previous your correction) ie: Symmetrical / Orthogonal / m still this paper is much more difficult to see to me
Regards
Sergio

Another one (I have some, starting with the easy ones, the problems are the chalky ones)

It looks like the first one, is this ZA1?
Thanks

Sergio

Another one, looks like the previous one ZA1. (horizontal lines not that marked but still there)
Is this correct?
Thanks
Sergio

stamps9407 escribió:I have another one, looks like Zarate paper (m position).

It looks like the other one (previous your correction) ie: Symmetrical / Orthogonal / m still this paper is much more difficult to see to me



Regards
Sergio

Sergio,

a bit too faint, seems to be asymmetrical!

saludos, Rein

stamps9407 escribió:Another one (I have some, starting with the easy ones, the problems are the chalky ones)

It looks like the first one, is this ZA1?




Thanks

Sergio

Sergio,

quite correct!!

saludos, Rein

stamps9407 escribió:Another one, looks like the previous one ZA1. (horizontal lines not that marked but still there)




Is this correct?

Thanks
Sergio

Sergio,

quite OK!!

saludos, Rein

Rein, Great!! now I have some chalky stamps, all of them are typo Because of this "rayado horizontal" may this be TI5?

What about the last one This "rayado horizontal" is not that clear in this one. Additionally looks like symmetrical
Thanks
Sergio

stamps9407 escribió:Rein, Great!! now I have some chalky stamps, all of them are typo

pyri010c_v03b_r2c1.jpg

Because of this "rayado horizontal" may this be TI5?

What about the last one



This "rayado horizontal" is not that clear in this one. Additionally looks like symmetrical
Thanks
Sergio

Sergio,

the coated stamps are awfully tricky! Have you read the Guillermo study??? {CastañoOchre]

saludos, Rein

No, is it in the foro?
Regards

stamps9407 escribió:No, is it in the foro?
Regards

Sergio,

http://filateliadigital.blogspot.com/p/bienvenidos.html
viewtopic.php?f=43&t=2230&start=83
http://filateliadigital.blogspot.com/20 ... esion.html

saludos, Rein

Rein
After your comment I searched for it and I found it. Just a couple of doubts / comments. So far I am interested in classifying papers, and my question is how this work, what looks more focus on printing methods, will help me to identify what kind of chalky paper is?
Thanks
Sergio

stamps9407 escribió:Rein
After your comment I searched for it and I found it. Just a couple of doubts / comments. So far I am interested in classifying papers, and my question is how this work, what looks more focus on printing methods, will help me to identify what kind of chalky paper is?
Thanks
Sergio

Sergio,

coated paper makes it more difficult to identify the paper! Try to get to know the various types first with uncoated paper! So far you are doing great!

saludos, Rein