Alejandro Pettovello escribió:Rein,
What do you think it is the best approach? The main division in PyRI is offset vs typo? or with/without watermark? or mate vs clay?
Alejandro,
the main division is offset-litho vs typography; second is uncoated [matt] vs coated [clay, tizado]
then the hard stuff: establishing the axis (direction of paper) / eje de enrollamiento AND establishing the paper wire - blue lines symmetrical vs blue lines asymmetrical ...
and further: the line of AЯ perpendicular to the axis [=orthogonal watermark] vs parallel to the axis [=parallel watermark]
Matt - MI 1, MI 2 MI 3, MI 4, MI 5, MI 6, MI 7, SF 1/2, SF 3, ZA 1, ZA 2 , ZA 3, ZA 4
Symmetrical - MI 1, MI 4 ; MI 2, MI 3, MI 7, SF 1/2, SF 3, ZA 2, ZA 4
Parallel - MI 1, MI 4 (the difference between them two is the density! MI 1 has 30/20, MI 4 has 24/22)
Orthogonal - MI 2, MI 3 = MI 7 [disputable]; ZA 2 = ZA 4 [disputable]
Diameter - MI 2, ZA 2 [8.5mm], MI 3 [10mm]
how to differentiate MI 2 and ZA 2? Timewise! MI 2 = 1937-1938, ZA 2 = 1954-1959; quite often (assumedly) no watermarks appear to be ZA! Practically all of them ARE produced in Zárate!!!! The Zárate papers have rough surfaces of the front - lots of grooves! MI 2 (Austriaco) has a heart-to heart distance of 16mm (instead of 17.5mm)....
Matt - MI 1, MI 2 MI 3, MI 4, MI 5, MI 6, MI 7, SF 1/2, SF 3, ZA 1, ZA 2 , ZA 3, ZA 4
Asymmetrical - MI 5, MI 6, ZA 1 = ZA 3 [disputable]
Parallel - MI 5
Orthogonal - MI 6, ZA 1
Diameter - MI 6 [10mm], ZA 1 (8.5mm)
Coated - TI 1, TI 2, TI 3, TI 4, TI 5, TI 6
Symmetrical - TI 1, TI 2, TI 4
Parallel - TI 1, TI 2, TI 4 (the difference between them is the density - TI 1 has 30/20, TI 2 has 30/16 and TI 4 has 24/22)
Coated - TI 1, TI 2, TI 3, TI 4, TI 5, TI 6
Asymmetrical - TI 3, TI 5, TI 6
Parallel - TI 3
Orthogonal - TI 5, TI 6 [the difference is in the thickness; TI 6 is very smooth and thin (delgado)]
THIS should do for the time being!!!!!!
saludos, Rein