Foro de Filatelia Argentina

Usually we overlook small details because we do not think it is relevant. A missing screen dot occurs in every photogravure printed postage stamp. But when a group of missing dots occurs on every stamp???

Or maybe somebody has the 1c Girasol in green without that indent?

Rein escribió:Usually we overlook small details because we do not think it is relevant. A missing screen dot occurs in every photogravure printed postage stamp. But when a group of missing dots occurs on every stamp???

Or maybe somebody has the 1c Girasol in green without that indent?

Some of you may have noticed that there are 2 more indents I have overlooked

Rein escribió:

The "fly-specks" at the right of the stem could have been accidental....

But now having 2 copies of them I begin to wonder?!

Hola

Rein, you are right! The missing dot in the bottom frame seems to be in all Girasoles-green stamps.
(I revised stamps with and without watermark and in all are the same)
Also, I have this block of 4: the vertical pair in the right side is more wide:
Saludos

Jorge,

both the Girasol and the Bariloche were also printed on the Mailander:


http://www.filateliaargentina.com.ar/fo ... che#p10646

Jorge,

I also found the wider version of the 1c Girasol!




it must have been printed on the Mailander; the direction of printing is L [ink flowing to the left] but the direction of paper is vertical!!!




A Casa de Moneda watermark plus red and blue fibres!

Direction of printing L:



you can see the ink flowing towards the left!

Jorge: En el cuadrito ilustrado se ve que hay un salto de peine verticaln resultado de el dentado "artesanal", En varias planchas que tengo a mano se ve que la primera hilera verical ( el peine tiene la línea larga vertical y el dentado horizontal es el que hace el ancho del sello, lado menor) no está alineada con el resto de los subsiguientes dentados horizontales, En otras palabtas, la primera fila ubica el dentado desparejo con respecto al resto y además está un poquito separada del resto, lo que priduce un sello más ancho.
En cuanto a la muesca en ambas impresiones, uno debe suponer que el multinegativo primario, utilizado en la Mailander, fue luego usado para la Goebel pero fotografiándolo a destinta escala, algo así como un efecto de zoom.Saludos,
José Merlo