
However, such lines can also originate from defectuous cylinders that got scratched!
How can we tell which case we are dealing with????
to be continued ...
Moderador: Rein
José,Otin escribió:Rein,
The crossing diagonal lines on $50.- San Martín were shown in my book El huecograbado y sus variedades. Unfortunaately the printing of its reproduction is very poor. I think that the crossing lines were produced by indents of the doctors blado that, as you know, has a continuos lateral movement from left to right and viceversa that could well be the cause of the crossing lines.
Do you agree?
Yes, I agree, the glass screen plates were terribly expensive and that is why they changed over to plastic ones and have the screen printed.... But screen 100 in general had been used for quite some time even just before World War II. Screens 60, 70 and 80 were more common. Screen 120 (125) is common since the 1970-ies and in the 1980-ies screen 150 emerged in Switzerland. In offset-printing a screen of 600dpi [=240 lines/cm] can be found occasionally.... But for photogravure 150 was the maximum I have seen until an American set of flower stamps turned up!On the other hand concerning the screens used in the 23p quebracho ( it`s an abbreviation of "quiebra hacha" = Ax broker, because they say its wood was so hard the axes got destroyed) I think I know the reason. Many years ago in a visit to the Casa de Moneda they took me to see the process of photogravure printing. They, among other things, showed me the screen. It was a piece of a rectangular thick glass with the scrreen produced by regular scratched, diagonal diagonal lines in one of its surfaces. Let´s say that it produced a coarse screening (today we would say few dpi) The second and finer screen (more dpi) was probably produce by a new screen they show me not so long ago. It was a plastic sheet with PRINTED diagonal lines so fine that it looked like and smoked color plastic sheet, impossible to be reproduce in the article I was writing. If I´m not wrong, they told me they were using this knew one because the glass one broke and a new glass one was too expensive.
Jose
José,Otin escribió:Rein,
I´m glad we agree. And thanks for all the info concerning screens you are giving.
José